The PGA 2000 diary
Posted: February 29th, 2020, 2:27 am
Diary Entry #1
As a newbie and liking to ramble on about my fav games, thought I would put all my ramblings in one thread.
I will add a post here and there to this thread of my PGA 2000 impressions as my experience with the game increases.
You can consider this thread my PGA 2000 diary.
Seasoned PGA players may find how a newbie like myself perceives this game in 2020 of some interest.
For other newbies who may come across this game and/or thread for the first time, it may help determine if the game is worth investigating further.
I'm going to start with a quick overview and will add to the thread over time.
I think you first need some perspective as to how good PGA 2000 was and where it sat in the golf sim market.
Back when PGA 2000 was released, I was a Microsoft Links junky and have been for 2 decades.
Back in 2000, we had what I remember as the BIG 3 in golf games, Microsoft Links, PGA 2000 and Golden Bear Challenge. Tiger Woods wasn't at this point considered a serious golf sim so didn't make the cut with most serious golf simmers.
All 3 games had very active communities. All 3 games were heavily supported by their communities.
Today, the Links community imo remains the most active. Is this because Links was the best golf sim of the 3? I believe the answer is no.
The Sierra PGA games ended with the 2000 version as the developer's moved to Tiger Woods. Links however, continued on for a few more years with Links 2001 and Links 2003.
I would suggest PGA 2000 lost many players who were simply searching for the latest current golf game. People always want and go too, "new."
These players would've either moved to Links or later on, to Tiger Woods.
This left the PGA 2000 player base with a distinct disadvantage and it's player numbers were always going to naturally fall as the game had no new versions in the pipeline.
It could never be taken as a reflection of the quality of the PGA 2000 game itself. It was simply a reflection of human tendencies with people seeking new/current.
20 years on and looking for a high quality golf game, here I am, exploring a game I knew had a huge following at one time. A game I know would only have had such a following if it had many positive attributes. A game that must've been good.
I'm now discovering these aspects and finding great enjoyment with PGA 2000 at this early stage.
Next time, I'm going to add 3 PGA 2000 features that immediately stood out to me as being a cut above the other golf games.
As a newbie and liking to ramble on about my fav games, thought I would put all my ramblings in one thread.
I will add a post here and there to this thread of my PGA 2000 impressions as my experience with the game increases.
You can consider this thread my PGA 2000 diary.
Seasoned PGA players may find how a newbie like myself perceives this game in 2020 of some interest.
For other newbies who may come across this game and/or thread for the first time, it may help determine if the game is worth investigating further.
I'm going to start with a quick overview and will add to the thread over time.
I think you first need some perspective as to how good PGA 2000 was and where it sat in the golf sim market.
Back when PGA 2000 was released, I was a Microsoft Links junky and have been for 2 decades.
Back in 2000, we had what I remember as the BIG 3 in golf games, Microsoft Links, PGA 2000 and Golden Bear Challenge. Tiger Woods wasn't at this point considered a serious golf sim so didn't make the cut with most serious golf simmers.
All 3 games had very active communities. All 3 games were heavily supported by their communities.
Today, the Links community imo remains the most active. Is this because Links was the best golf sim of the 3? I believe the answer is no.
The Sierra PGA games ended with the 2000 version as the developer's moved to Tiger Woods. Links however, continued on for a few more years with Links 2001 and Links 2003.
I would suggest PGA 2000 lost many players who were simply searching for the latest current golf game. People always want and go too, "new."
These players would've either moved to Links or later on, to Tiger Woods.
This left the PGA 2000 player base with a distinct disadvantage and it's player numbers were always going to naturally fall as the game had no new versions in the pipeline.
It could never be taken as a reflection of the quality of the PGA 2000 game itself. It was simply a reflection of human tendencies with people seeking new/current.
20 years on and looking for a high quality golf game, here I am, exploring a game I knew had a huge following at one time. A game I know would only have had such a following if it had many positive attributes. A game that must've been good.
I'm now discovering these aspects and finding great enjoyment with PGA 2000 at this early stage.
Next time, I'm going to add 3 PGA 2000 features that immediately stood out to me as being a cut above the other golf games.